None of the screenplays here have (so far) been produced. Nevertheless, the process of writing them has benefited me enormously both as an educator and as a dramatist developing my practice. Moving from the very language-based medium of theatre writing to the visual medium of film, I needed to develop a visual language. Film sequences are hieroglyphics in motion, conveying meaning as well as story. Film scripts are indicators of the contents of these dynamic hieroglyphs. I am privileged that, as a research-through-practice academic, no endeavour of script development is wasted. There’s a growing movement within the academy for practitioners to share the knowledge created via screenwriting, whether or not the screenplay is produced.
Note:
Crime films featuring gangsters are a large if not so respectable
part of the British film industry’s output. This crime screenplay
offered me a chance to meditate on violence, what it achieves, what
are its consequences for the self and others. For material, I
researched biographies and memoirs of the Krays and their
associates. In terms of style, I looked at some 1980s Charles
Bronson films, made with the British director J. Lee Thompson;
dismissed as populist fodder, they’re a genuine and felt engagement
with stresses caused by demands on men to put things right by any
means necessary. I also looked at the crime thrillers of the Italian
director Fernando di Leo. His criminals are desperate men on one
last course towards an inevitable grave, causing as much havoc as
possible. Fascinating material, with heavily Catholic threads
running through them – how steeped in sin these men are! I used
these sources as a way into engaging my story, pushing myself to
take the protagonist as deep as possible into the dark places his
undertaking leads him. It’s led me to some conversations with
producers. It’s a bleak and brutal work but that’s okay in the
context of what it is about, and its genre.
Story:
A violent offender, known as Old School, gets out after a long
sentence. He wants to go straight, live a life of peace and service.
When he finds himself involved in a fight to save a community youth
centre from property developers, he discovers his old talent for
extreme violence comes in useful. When the fight gives him the
chance to revenge himself on the man who put him inside, he finds
that violence is not only useful – it satisfies his deepest
cravings. Is he saving the club, or dragging it down to hell?
Note:
I developed this for a while with White Dolphin films. The director,
Andy Kelleher, had the idea and I wrote a number of drafts. It’s
about betrayal, on the surface between family members. But
underneath, for me it’s about the way our bodies betray us in their
unruly needs and lusts. I wrote various drafts of two versions: one
for a microbudget feature; the other an hour-long TV play. Andy was
pleased with the results but the production company never secured
the finance.
Story:
Straight-laced Paul has a difficult, bitter relationship with his
reckless, bisexual, drug-taking father, Dave. Paul blames Dave for
the death of his Mum. Thug-for-hire Ray gets involved, carrying
father issues of his own. Things hurtle towards a final reckoning.
Note:
A commission from a producer/director named Eddie King, who wanted a
cross between Kidulthood and an American TV series called
The OJ. He was keen to have two social groups clash. This
gave me the chance to interweave a lot of different stories. I was
intrigued by the idea that the neglect society shows towards one
class might end up damaging those who have more privilege. King
filmed a few test scenes but didn’t manage to get the film off the
ground.
Story:
A hot summer Saturday. In Chelsea, siblings Eva and Hugo plan their
glittering futures: she, as the bride of aristocratic Charles; he,
as a photo-journalist. Eva’s best friend Mia is in love with Hugo,
and today is the day when she discovers that he reciprocates her
feelings. Across the river, in Battersea, half-brothers Sunny and
Dean celebrate Dean’s early release from prison with a vicious
revenge attack on the kid who grassed him up. That afternoon, the
two sets go about their contrasting pursuits. The rich kids shop at
the swankiest stores & indulge their every desire; the penniless
youths prey on weekend shoppers and spend the proceeds of their
robberies on drugs and weapons. That evening each group heads out
for a night on the town. It’s cruising in Ferraris and exclusive
clubs for the fortunate clique but the Battersea gang are not
welcomed in even the grottiest Chelsea pub. Yet the street is the
place where worlds can collide. When that happens, the result is
tragedy.
Note:
I had the story of Babes in the Wood in my mind. I mixed in
some of the punishment of Marsyas. Some of my anger over Iraq also
seeped in. I was after something with the tone of a Haneke. This was
never going to be a commercial script. Writing it taught me
something about where you come into a film story. I think I came in
too early in this. You live and learn. It’s probably the only script
anywhere which climaxes in the flaying of a harpsichordist. Howard,
the harpsichordist, was inspired by the playwright Howard Barker.
Story:
Two teenagers, Andy and Kelly, escape their haunted, abusive pasts
in the provinces to find a new life in the capitol. All that seems
open to them are dead-end jobs on low wages. A chance meeting with a
pair of wealthy siblings sees them installed as housekeepers in a
luxurious St. John's Wood mansion. Andy and Kelly believe they have
it made. But there is a cuckoo in the nest. One of the rooms in the
mansion is inhabited by Howard, a moody harpsichordist with no love
for the siblings. Andy finds himself strangely drawn to the
enigmatic Howard, leaving Kelly feeling increasingly out in the
cold. The arrival of the siblings' charismatic younger brother Piers
brings the situation to a head. Andy and Kelly are persuaded that
Howard's presence in the house is sinister and toxic. Andy's
fascination turns to revulsion and Kelly's jealousy morphs into
fury. Piers provides a final solution to the problem of Howard. The
kids are willing to play their part. Have Andy and Kelly finally
made the right choice in agreeing to dispose of their employer’s
enemy? Or have they been used in a power struggle which goes way
above their heads?
Note:
I was invited onto a BBC Writer’s Room development course. There
were 12 of us, including Simon Stephens and Parv Bancil. We were all
commissioned to write original 60-minute TV scripts. We’d get
feedback from BBC script editors and producers. I’d been writing
about Blake, so wanted to do something in his spirit. I carried some
of the Coming Up idea of alter-egos into the development. It
was a contemporary setting which erupts into visions of heaven and
hell. The feedback was that the script was pretty unique! Perhaps I
hadn’t quite pulled it off. One of the producers said that my
antagonist, Sawney, was the greatest character she’d ever read. I
bonded with Parv Bancil. We had similar tastes and liked each
others’ scripts (which were both pretty out there). Years later, I
heard Parv died. Funny how sometimes you meet someone briefly but
they make a big impression; his death deeply saddened me.
Story:
For a couple of weeks now Jake has been waking up in the mornings
with a hangover and a nagging feeling that something odd has been
happening in the pub after work with his fellow employees. He's
seeing reflections that scare him in the mirror. At work, he doesn’t
intervene as his friend and colleague Sawney humiliate women and
subordinates. Jake's personal life is off-track. He is estranged
from his wife Suzanne; they can't seem to connect anymore. Sawney is
in a loveless marriage with his wife, Leah. It gradually becomes
clear to Jake that the negative and viperous Sawney is an actual
demon; their friendship has dragged Jake down to hell. He
experiences their regular pub transformed into the pit, where Satan
pontificates. But another office employee, Pete, is playing for the
other team. Jake might have a way out of damnation.